Brennan v. Brooks
This text of 61 S.E. 1035 (Brennan v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. In a proceeding before the ordinary to remove obstructions from a private way, under the Political Code, §679, the description of the private way is not required to be set out with that particularity demanded in a proceeding to lay out and establish a private way, but it. will be sufficient if it serves to identify an existing private way across which an obstruction had been placed. Kirkland v. Pittman, 122 Ga. 256 (50 S. E. 117). The description of the private w.ay in the petition in this case was sufficiently definite.
2. The averments in the petition were sufficient to show that the private way traversed “improved-land.” Hopkins v. Roach, 127 Ga. 153 (56 S. E. 303).
3. Though conflicting, the evidence before the ordinary was sufficient to sustain his finding.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 S.E. 1035, 131 Ga. 94, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brennan-v-brooks-ga-1908.