Brendoff v. Nelson

Fourth Circuit

Brendoff v. Nelson

78 F. App'x 894

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 27, 2003·No. No. 03-6734·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Richard Brendoff appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint alleging excessive use of force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brendoff v. Nelson, No. CA-00-331-AMD (D.Md. Mar. 31, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Richard Brendoff appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint alleging excessive use of force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brendoff v. Nelson, No. CA-00-331-AMD (D.Md. Mar. 31, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brendoff v. Nelson, 78 F. App'x 894 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

78 F. App'x 894 (Brendoff v. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related