Brendle ex rel. Brendle v. Stafford
97 S.E.2d 843, 246 N.C. 218, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 392
Opinion
The evidence, though conflicting, was amply sufficient to support the finding that the defendant Stafford was a resident of Guilford County at the time the action was instituted. An action such as this may be brought in the county where the plaintiffs or the defendants, or any one of them, had residence at the time summons was issued. G.S. 1-82. Removal for convenience is discretionary.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brendle ex rel. Brendle v. Stafford, 97 S.E.2d 843, 246 N.C. 218, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 392 (N.C. 1957).
97 S.E.2d 843 (Brendle ex rel. Brendle v. Stafford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bass v. Bass
258 S.E.2d 391 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)
Piner v. Ryder Truck Rentals, Inc.
179 S.E.2d 900 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)