Brendle ex rel. Brendle v. Stafford

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Brendle ex rel. Brendle v. Stafford

97 S.E.2d 843, 246 N.C. 218, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 392

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMay 8, 1957

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 97 S.E.2d 843 (Brendle ex rel. Brendle v. Stafford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brendle ex rel. Brendle v. Stafford, 97 S.E.2d 843, 246 N.C. 218, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 392 (N.C. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PeR CüRiam.

The evidence, though conflicting, was amply sufficient to support the finding that the defendant Stafford was a resident of Guilford County at the time the action was instituted. An action such as this may be brought in the county where the plaintiffs or the defendants, or any one of them, had residence at the time summons was issued. G.S. 1-82. Removal for convenience is discretionary.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PeR CüRiam.

The evidence, though conflicting, was amply sufficient to support the finding that the defendant Stafford was a resident of Guilford County at the time the action was instituted. An action such as this may be brought in the county where the plaintiffs or the defendants, or any one of them, had residence at the time summons was issued. G.S. 1-82. Removal for convenience is discretionary.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 S.E.2d 843, 246 N.C. 218, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brendle-ex-rel-brendle-v-stafford-nc-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack