Brenda W. Hughes v. Dan A. Hughes
Opinion
NUMBER 13-15-00496-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
BRENDA W. HUGHES, Appellant, v.
DAN A. HUGHES, Appellee.
On Appeal from the 36th District Court of Bee County, Texas.
ORDER
Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria Order Per Curiam
This cause is before the Court on a motion by appellant’s counsel to review the
sealed reporter’s record. On October 13, 2015, the trial court issued an order sealing court records. The order states that all documents containing the trial court number, except those documents that are required by law to be recorded in the minutes of the court, are sealed and shall not be opened or released except on appropriate court order,
other than to attorneys of record for a party and the parties themselves. The reporter’s record, including exhibits, was filed under seal on February 25, 2016. Appellant’s counsel is requesting to withdraw the reporter’s record and exhibits.
The Court GRANTS counsel’s motion to review the sealed reporter’s record.
Appellant’s counsel is ordered to agree and to abide by the sealing order of the trial court. The Court ORDERS counsel to treat the CDRom as confidential and to safeguard it as an official and original court document. Counsel is ordered to maintain the confidentiality of the information contained in this sealed record and is prohibited from disseminating the sensitive information contained within the sealed record to any person.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 9th day of May, 2016.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brenda W. Hughes v. Dan A. Hughes (Brenda W. Hughes v. Dan A. Hughes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.