Brenda Stumbo v. Karen Lovejoy Roe
This text of Brenda Stumbo v. Karen Lovejoy Roe (Brenda Stumbo v. Karen Lovejoy Roe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
June 12, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
161433 & (26) David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra BRENDA STUMBO and LARRY DOE, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiffs-Appellants, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 161433 COA: 353695 Washtenaw CC: 20-000443-CZ KAREN LOVEJOY ROE, Defendant, and HEATHER JARRELL ROE, Defendant-Appellee. _________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 12, 2020 b0611 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brenda Stumbo v. Karen Lovejoy Roe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brenda-stumbo-v-karen-lovejoy-roe-mich-2020.