Brenda Hoogenstyn v. Orthopaedic Associates of Grand Rapids Pc
This text of Brenda Hoogenstyn v. Orthopaedic Associates of Grand Rapids Pc (Brenda Hoogenstyn v. Orthopaedic Associates of Grand Rapids Pc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 29, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
156220(57) Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Kurtis T. Wilder BRENDA HOOGENSTYN, Elizabeth T. Clement, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices
v SC: 156220 COA: 332063 Kent CC: 14-010008-NH ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES OF GRAND RAPIDS, PC, and JULIAN KUZ, M.D., Defendants-Appellees, and WALKER SURGICAL CENTER, LLC, and MICHAEL BURTON, Defendants. _________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 20, 2018 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. May 29, 2018 a0521 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brenda Hoogenstyn v. Orthopaedic Associates of Grand Rapids Pc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brenda-hoogenstyn-v-orthopaedic-associates-of-grand-rapids-pc-mich-2018.