Brenda H. v. Johnson
This text of 269 A.D.2d 787 (Brenda H. v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioners challenge respondent’s determination after a fair hearing denying their request to expunge their names from the State Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment. Because petitioners failed to include in their brief numerous issues raised in their petition, those issues are deemed abandoned (see, Matter of Roe v Selsky, 250 AD2d 935, 937; see also, Matter of Kalis v McCall, 257 AD2d 838, 839, n; Matter of Lee TT. v Wing, 248 AD2d 785, 786, n 2). In any event those contentions are without merit. The contentions asserted in petitioners’ brief are likewise without merit. The proceeding was properly transferred because the petition raised the issue of substantial evidence (see, CPLR 7804 [g]), and the answer was a proper response to the petition. (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sconiers, J.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Hurlbutt and Balio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D.2d 787, 703 N.Y.S.2d 775, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brenda-h-v-johnson-nyappdiv-2000.