Brenda Gale WILLETT, Appellant, v. EMORY AND HENRY COLLEGE, a Virginia Corporation, Appellee

569 F.2d 212, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 12955, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8043, 16 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 624
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 20, 1978
Docket77-1460
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 569 F.2d 212 (Brenda Gale WILLETT, Appellant, v. EMORY AND HENRY COLLEGE, a Virginia Corporation, Appellee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brenda Gale WILLETT, Appellant, v. EMORY AND HENRY COLLEGE, a Virginia Corporation, Appellee, 569 F.2d 212, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 12955, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8043, 16 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 624 (4th Cir. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Brenda Gale Willett, an employee of Emory and Henry College, filed this action against the College seeking damages and injunctive relief under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., and the Equal Pay Act of 1963, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d).

The thrust of the plaintiff’s lawsuit was that the pregnancy benefits provision of the group health and hospitalization insurance plan of the College discriminated against her on account of sex. Specifically, the plaintiff charged that the policy provision *213 relative to the payment of pregnancy benefits was discriminatory because it required that the named insured also enroll all of his or her dependents in the plan in order to establish entitlement to such benefits. In a thorough and well reasoned opinion the district judge, noting that the dependency requirement applied with equal force to male as well as female employees, concluded that the alleged discrimination, if any, was based upon the marital status of the participant and did not give rise to a cause of action for sex discrimination under either Title VII or the Equal Pay Act. We agree with this conclusion and affirm for reasons sufficiently stated in the opinion of the district court. Willett v. Emory and Henry College, 421 F.Supp. 631 (W.D.Va.1977).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
569 F.2d 212, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 12955, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8043, 16 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brenda-gale-willett-appellant-v-emory-and-henry-college-a-virginia-ca4-1978.