Brenda Elaine King v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 12, 2007
Docket03-06-00419-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Brenda Elaine King v. State (Brenda Elaine King v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brenda Elaine King v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00419-CR

Brenda Elaine King, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 5 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. 687829, HONORABLE NANCY WRIGHT HOHENGARTEN, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Brenda Elaine King appeals pro se her misdemeanor conviction for resisting

arrest. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 38.03 (West 2003). Challenging the jury’s finding of guilt,

appellant complains that the evidence showed that she did not resist arrest and that she was

wrongfully convicted.

Appellant did not request a reporter’s record or file an affidavit of indigence. See

Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(b); In re Spiegel, 6 S.W.3d 643, 646 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1999, no pet.); see

also Halliburton v. State, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 2644, at *3-4 (Tex. App.—Tyler Mar. 31, 2006,

no pet.) (not designated for publication). After appellant was given notice and an opportunity to

cure, the appeal was submitted for decision without a reporter’s record. See Tex. R. App. P.

37.3(c)(1). When a reporter’s record is necessary for appellate review and the appellant fails to

file the reporter’s record, a presumption arises that the reporter’s record would support the

trial court’s judgment. Rittenhouse v. Sabine Valley Ctr. Found., 161 S.W.3d 157, 165

(Tex. App.—Texarkana 2005, no pet.). Moreover, if an appellant does not initiate the completion

of a record and her issue involves matters omitted from the record due to her failure to request or pay

for the record, her actions will prevent an appellate court from adequately addressing the dispute.

In this case, appellant did not request a reporter’s record nor did she file an affidavit of indigence.

Without the reporter’s record, we cannot determine that the trial court erred.

Accordingly, we overrule appellant’s issues and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop

Affirmed

Filed: June 12, 2007

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Marriage of Spiegel
6 S.W.3d 643 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Rittenhouse v. Sabine Valley Center Foundation, Inc.
161 S.W.3d 157 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brenda Elaine King v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brenda-elaine-king-v-state-texapp-2007.