Home/Ninth Circuit/Brenda BRUSH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAN FRANCISCO NEWSPAPER PRINTING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

Brenda BRUSH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAN FRANCISCO NEWSPAPER PRINTING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

469 F.2d 89, 5 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 20, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7504, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 7981
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 19, 1972
Docket26666
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 469 F.2d 89 (Brenda BRUSH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAN FRANCISCO NEWSPAPER PRINTING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brenda BRUSH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAN FRANCISCO NEWSPAPER PRINTING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, 469 F.2d 89, 5 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 20, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7504, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 7981 (9th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court against Brush is affirmed.

The object of the complaint was to stop the San Francisco Chronicle and the San Francisco Examiner (published by the San Francisco Newspaper Printing Company) from using in employment ads classifications of male and female.

To rule with plaintiff-appellant would require the district court and us to find that the defendant, when it publishes help wanted ads, is an employment agency. Neither the dictionary nor the legislative history supports this construction. The legislative history contributes little.

We are in substantial agreement with the district court’s opinion. Brush v. San Francisco Newspaper Printing Company, 315 F.Supp. 577 (1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Veasy v. Teach for America, Inc.
868 F. Supp. 2d 688 (M.D. Tennessee, 2012)
Bonomo v. National Duckpin Bowling Congress, Inc.
469 F. Supp. 467 (D. Maryland, 1979)
12 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,175, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7770 Geraldine G. Cannon v. The University of Chicago, Geraldine G. Cannon v. Northwestern University
559 F.2d 1063 (Seventh Circuit, 1977)
Cannon v. University of Chicago
559 F.2d 1063 (Seventh Circuit, 1976)
Cannon v. University of Chicago
406 F. Supp. 1257 (N.D. Illinois, 1976)
Evening Sentinel v. National Organization for Women
357 A.2d 498 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1975)
Kaplowitz v. University of Chicago
387 F. Supp. 42 (N.D. Illinois, 1974)
The Passaic Daily News v. Blair
308 A.2d 649 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
469 F.2d 89, 5 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 20, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7504, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 7981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brenda-brush-plaintiff-appellant-v-san-francisco-newspaper-printing-ca9-1972.