Bremser v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bremser v. State

322 So. 2d 642

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 25, 1975·No. No. 75-587·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to CrPR 3.850. The ground urged on the motion is that the court failed to determine the factual basis of defendant’s guilty plea. The judge who denied the motion was the trial judge in the cause. The record clearly reflects the voluntariness of the plea and the fact that the defendant understood the nature and consequences of his plea agreement; there is no showing of prejudice or manifest injustice. Therefore, the denial of the motion is affirmed upon authority of Williams v. State, Fla.1975, 316 So.2d 267.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to CrPR 3.850. The ground urged on the motion is that the court failed to determine the factual basis of defendant’s guilty plea. The judge who denied the motion was the trial judge in the cause. The record clearly reflects the voluntariness of the plea and the fact that the defendant understood the nature and consequences of his plea agreement; there is no showing of prejudice or manifest injustice. Therefore, the denial of the motion is affirmed upon authority of Williams v. State, Fla.1975, 316 So.2d 267.

Affirmed.

Bremser v. State, 322 So. 2d 642 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

322 So. 2d 642 (Bremser v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related