Bremser v. State

322 So. 2d 642
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 25, 1975
DocketNo. 75-587
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 322 So. 2d 642 (Bremser v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bremser v. State, 322 So. 2d 642 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to CrPR 3.850. The ground urged on the motion is that the court failed to determine the factual basis of defendant’s guilty plea. The judge who denied the motion was the trial judge in the cause. The record clearly reflects the voluntariness of the plea and the fact that the defendant understood the nature and consequences of his plea agreement; there is no showing of prejudice or manifest injustice. Therefore, the denial of the motion is affirmed upon authority of Williams v. State, Fla.1975, 316 So.2d 267.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cardona v. State
592 So. 2d 796 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Blue v. State
380 So. 2d 451 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Clark v. State
371 So. 2d 1060 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
322 So. 2d 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bremser-v-state-fladistctapp-1975.