Bremner v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 12, 1997·No. 97-1729·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1729

ROBERT G. BREMNER, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judges. (MISC-97-4-3)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 12, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert G. Bremner, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edward Brookhart, Sara Ann Ketchum, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his Peti-

tion to Quash Internal Revenue Service Third Party Summons. Our review of the record discloses that the Government met its burden of proof under 26 U.S.C. § 7602 (1994) to support the enforcement

of the summons. See United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48, 57-58 (1964); Alphin v. United States, 809 F.2d 236, 238 (4th Cir. 1987).

Moreover, we find that the district court did not abuse its discre- tion in denying Appellant's motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 52,

59. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bremner v. United States, (4th Cir. 1997).

Bremner v. United States (Bremner v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Powell
379 U.S. 48 (Supreme Court, 1964)