Bremner v. Thomas

25 F.2d 301, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2953
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 7, 1928
DocketNo. 7858
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 25 F.2d 301 (Bremner v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bremner v. Thomas, 25 F.2d 301, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2953 (8th Cir. 1928).

Opinion

STONE, Circuit Judge.

This is a plenary action by the receiver of the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad Company against the receiver of the Merchants’ National Bank of Grinnell, Iowa, having as its object the impounding of certain moneys in the hands of the latter on the theory that such are held by him as trustee ex maleficio. The trial court sustained a motion to dismiss the bill upon the merits. From such order of dismissal this appeal is taken.

It is the duty of federal appellate courts, in every case, to examine its jurisdiction, whether such point has been raised or not. Smyth v. Asphalt Belt Ry., 267 U. S. 326, 327, 45 S. Ct. 242, 69 L. Ed. 629; Smith v. Apple, 264 U. S. 274, 275, 44 S. Ct. 311, 68 L. Ed. 678; Stevirmac Oil & Gas Co. v. Dittman, 245 U. S. 210, 214, 38 S. Ct. 116, 62 L. Ed. 248; M., C. & L. M. Ry. Co. v. Swan, 111 U. S. 379, 382; Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. Rayl, 16 F.(2d) 68 (this court); Elliott v. Empire Natural Gas Co., 4 F.(2d) 493, 494 (this court); Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co. v. Village of Kinney, 266 F. 888, 889 (this court); C. C. Taft Co. v. Century Savings Bank, 141 F. 369, 371 (this court). Such examination in this ease reveals that the order from which the appeal was taken was entered December 2,1926; that the petition for appeal and the assignment of errors was filed April 4, 1927, and the appeal allowed April 11, 1927. As the petition for appeal and assignment of errors were filed more than three months after the entry of the order from which the appeal is taken (Act Feb. 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936, USCA tit. 28, § 225 [28 USCA § 230]), and, as this'matter is jurisdictional, the appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction because not taken within the time required by law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Estate of Cheong Chinn
359 P.2d 932 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1961)
Alexander v. Special School District
132 F.2d 355 (Eighth Circuit, 1943)
United States v. Nordbye
75 F.2d 744 (Eighth Circuit, 1935)
Muckelroy v. Baldwin
70 F.2d 728 (Eighth Circuit, 1934)
Osborn v. United States
50 F.2d 712 (Fourth Circuit, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 F.2d 301, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bremner-v-thomas-ca8-1928.