Bremer v. Department of Homeland Security

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin
DecidedApril 13, 2022
Docket2:22-cv-00295
StatusUnknown

This text of Bremer v. Department of Homeland Security (Bremer v. Department of Homeland Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Wisconsin primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bremer v. Department of Homeland Security, (E.D. Wis. 2022).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

MARTINA BREMER, A011-673-653,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 22-CV-295

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Plaintiff Martina Bremer filed this action on March 8, 2022, requesting the Court to order the government to change the date of birth on her Naturalization Certificate from November 24, 1955 to December 24, 1954. The plaintiff alleges that the incorrect date of birth was not the result of a clerical error by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”); rather, it was due to information understood by the Plaintiff as being accurate at the time her naturalization certificate was issued, which date she has since discovered to be in error. USCIS has determined that the plaintiff has provided reliable evidence of her correct date of birth, to wit, December 24, 1954. Consequently, USCIS does not oppose the issuance of an order directing: 1) defendant USCIS to reopen the matter in which it previously denied the plaintiff’s Application for Replacement Naturalization/Citizenship Document (Form N-565) and issue a new Naturalization Certificate reflecting plaintiff’s date of birth as December 24, 1954; and 2) dismisses this action, with prejudice, with each party being responsible for their own costs and fees. The defendants note that the plaintiff concurs with that disposition. Although USCIS may not have administrative power to change the date of birth on the plaintiff’s Naturalization Certificate, the Court has the power to order the amendment.

See Mahamud v. Department of Homeland Security, Case No. 16-cv-2609 (JRT/HB), 2017 WL 2684224, at *2 (D. Minn. May 9, 2017); Collins v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, 820 F.3d 1096, 1100 (9th Cir. 2016); Ampadu v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service, Dist. Director, 944 F.Supp.2d 648 (C.D. Ill. 2013); Hussain v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, 541 F. Supp. 2d 1083, 1085 (D. Minn. 2008); Zhang v. United States Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:06-MC-122, 2007 WL 2156648, at *2 (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 25, 2002); Cam Tu Trinh v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, No. 09-MC-42 (E.D. Wis. Feb 23, 2010); Hue Thang Lien v. USCIS, et al, Case No. 13-CV-1241 (E.D. Wis. Dec. 19, 2013).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s request for amendment to her Naturalization Certificate is GRANTED. Defendant USCIS will reopen the matter in which it previously denied the plaintiff’s Application for Replacement Naturalization/Citizenship Document (Form N-565) and issue a new Naturalization Certificate reflecting plaintiff’s date of birth as December 24, 1954. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE without an award of costs or fees to either party. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 12" day of April, 2022.

} THE ad NANCY JOSE United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hussain v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services
541 F. Supp. 2d 1082 (D. Minnesota, 2008)
Ampadu v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services
944 F. Supp. 2d 648 (C.D. Illinois, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bremer v. Department of Homeland Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bremer-v-department-of-homeland-security-wied-2022.