Brem v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Brem v. State

61 S.W.2d 1115

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 7, 1933

DocketNo. 16056

StatusPublished

This text of 61 S.W.2d 1115 (Brem v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brem v. State, 61 S.W.2d 1115 (Tex. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is unlawfully passing a forged instrument; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The facts are not before this court. The indictment appears regular. No fault in the procedure has been perceived or pointed out which would authorize á.reversal of the judgment. No complaint of the ruling of the court is presented by bills of exception or otherwise. There appear in the motion for new trial some statements of irregularities, which are not verified either by the trial judge nor by thé affidavit of the appellant.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is unlawfully passing a forged instrument; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The facts are not before this court. The indictment appears regular. No fault in the procedure has been perceived or pointed out which would authorize á.reversal of the judgment. No complaint of the ruling of the court is presented by bills of exception or otherwise. There appear in the motion for new trial some statements of irregularities, which are not verified either by the trial judge nor by thé affidavit of the appellant.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 S.W.2d 1115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brem-v-state-texcrimapp-1933.