Breland v. Kerik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Breland v. Kerik

293 A.D.2d 415, 740 N.Y.S.2d 855, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4319

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 30, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 293 A.D.2d 415 (Breland v. Kerik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Breland v. Kerik, 293 A.D.2d 415, 740 N.Y.S.2d 855, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4319 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated September 21, 2000, placing petitioner on probation dismissal for one year and suspending her [416]*416for 45 days, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [William Wetzel, J.], entered March 28, 2001), dismissed, without costs.

Respondent’s findings were supported by substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 179-183), including the testimony of petitioner’s superior officers. Contrary to petitioner’s contentions, there is no basis upon which to disturb the trial commissioner’s credibility determinations (see, Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444). In addition, considering the numerous specifications petitioner was found guilty of committing, the penalty imposed is not so disproportionate to petitioner’s offenses as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see, Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32).

We find petitioner’s remaining contentions unavailing. Concur—Williams, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated September 21, 2000, placing petitioner on probation dismissal for one year and suspending her [416]*416for 45 days, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [William Wetzel, J.], entered March 28, 2001), dismissed, without costs.

Respondent’s findings were supported by substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 179-183), including the testimony of petitioner’s superior officers. Contrary to petitioner’s contentions, there is no basis upon which to disturb the trial commissioner’s credibility determinations (see, Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444). In addition, considering the numerous specifications petitioner was found guilty of committing, the penalty imposed is not so disproportionate to petitioner’s offenses as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see, Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32).

We find petitioner’s remaining contentions unavailing. Concur—Williams, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 A.D.2d 415, 740 N.Y.S.2d 855, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breland-v-kerik-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack