Brekhus v. N. Dakota Dep't of Transp.
This text of 909 N.W.2d 113 (Brekhus v. N. Dakota Dep't of Transp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[¶ 1] The North Dakota Department of Transportation appeals from the district court's judgment reversing an administrative hearing officer's decision revoking Deanne M. Brekhus's driving privileges for 180 days.
[¶ 2] The administrative hearing officer found law enforcement had reason to believe Brekhus committed a moving traffic violation and Brekhus refused to submit to either on-site screening or chemical tests. The district court reversed, concluding the evidence presented at the administrative hearing was obtained in violation of Brekhus's constitutional rights. The Department appealed, arguing the evidence was obtained under the hot pursuit exception to the warrant requirement. We agree, concluding City of Bismarck v. Brekhus ,
[¶ 3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jon J. Jensen
Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
909 N.W.2d 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brekhus-v-n-dakota-dept-of-transp-nd-2018.