Brekhus v. N. Dakota Dep't of Transp.

909 N.W.2d 113
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedApril 10, 2018
DocketNo. 20170296
StatusPublished

This text of 909 N.W.2d 113 (Brekhus v. N. Dakota Dep't of Transp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brekhus v. N. Dakota Dep't of Transp., 909 N.W.2d 113 (N.D. 2018).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] The North Dakota Department of Transportation appeals from the district court's judgment reversing an administrative hearing officer's decision revoking Deanne M. Brekhus's driving privileges for 180 days.

[¶ 2] The administrative hearing officer found law enforcement had reason to believe Brekhus committed a moving traffic violation and Brekhus refused to submit to either on-site screening or chemical tests. The district court reversed, concluding the evidence presented at the administrative hearing was obtained in violation of Brekhus's constitutional rights. The Department appealed, arguing the evidence was obtained under the hot pursuit exception to the warrant requirement. We agree, concluding City of Bismarck v. Brekhus , 2018 ND 84, ¶ 27, 908 N.W.2d 715, controls in this appeal. There, we held the officer's warrantless, limited entry into Brekhus's open garage while in hot pursuit was constitutionally reasonable. We summarily reverse the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b) and reinstate the administrative order.

[¶ 3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen

Jerod E. Tufte

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Bismarck v. Brekhus
2018 ND 84 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
909 N.W.2d 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brekhus-v-n-dakota-dept-of-transp-nd-2018.