Breithaupt v. the Bank of Georgia

26 U.S. 238, 7 L. Ed. 127, 1 Pet. 238, 1828 U.S. LEXIS 403
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 18, 1828·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court

This is not a case within the jurisdiction of • the Courts óf the United Státes.-.. The récord does not show, that the defendants were citizens of Georgia, nor are there any distinct allegations or averments, that the same was the fact, as to the stockholders in the bank.

This, cause came on, &c., on consideration whereof, This Court is of opinion, that as the bill does not aver that the cor-porators of the Bank of the State of Georgia, which bank is defendant in the suit,- are citizens of the state of Georgia, the Circuit Court has no jurisdiction of the cause, and can grant no .relief. It is therefore .ordered to be certified to the Circuit Court, as the opinion of this Court, that, in 'the present state of, the pleadings, it not appearing that the defendants are citizens of. the state of Georgia, the complainants are not entitled to relief in that Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Breithaupt v. the Bank of Georgia, 26 U.S. 238, 7 L. Ed. 127, 1 Pet. 238, 1828 U.S. LEXIS 403 (1828).

26 U.S. 238 (Breithaupt v. the Bank of Georgia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.
145 U.S. 444 (Supreme Court, 1892)
Marshall v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
57 U.S. 314 (Supreme Court, 1854)
Oakey v. Commercial & Rail Road Bank of Vicksburg
14 La. 515 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1840)