Breithaupt v. C&W Facility Services, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedJanuary 24, 2023
Docket2:22-cv-01482
StatusUnknown

This text of Breithaupt v. C&W Facility Services, Inc. (Breithaupt v. C&W Facility Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Breithaupt v. C&W Facility Services, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Opinion

1 Renee C. Feldman, Bar No. 253877 rfeldman@littler.com 2 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Treat Towers 3 1255 Treat Boulevard Suite 600 4 Walnut Creek, California 94597 Telephone: 925.932.2468 5 Fax No.: 925.946.9809 6 Attorneys for Defendant C&W FACILITY SERVICES, INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NILES BREITHAUPT, Case No. 2:22-cv-01482-JAM-KJN 12 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 v. 14 C&W FACILITY SERVICES, INC., a Massachusetts corporation; and DOES 1 through 15 50, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, 3 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for 4 any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby 5 stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties 6 acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 7 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited 8 information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. 9 The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective 10 Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 141 sets forth 11 the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks 12 permission from the court to file material under seal. 13 2. DEFINITIONS 14 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information 15 or items under this Order. 16 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 17 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of 18 Civil Procedure 26(c). 19 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 20 their support staff). 21 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 22 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 23 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or 24 manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 25 transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery 26 in this matter. 27 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the 28 litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 1 consultant in this action. 2 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House Counsel 3 does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 4 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 5 entity not named as a Party to this action. 6 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action 7 but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf 8 of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 9 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 10 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 11 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material 12 in this action. 13 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., 14 photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, 15 or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 16 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 17 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 18 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 19 Producing Party. 20 3. SCOPE 21 The types of information eligible for protection under this Stipulation and Order include, 22 without limitation: documents constituting or relating to medical records, disability, request for 23 accommodation, or vaccination status of Plaintiff or Defendant’s employees; documents constituting or 24 related to employment personnel records of Plaintiff or Defendant’s employees, which is private 25 pursuant to Article 1 Section 1 of the California Constitution; documents constituting or related to 26 Defendant’s confidential policies; documents constituting or related to employment investigations 27 regarding Plaintiff and the termination of Plaintiff’s employment. Courts have routinely recognized a 28 legally cognizable privacy interest in records of this nature. See e.g., Doe v. A. J. Boggs & Co., No. 1 118CV01464AWIBAM, 2019 WL 1517567, at *6 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2019) (citing Pettus v. Cole, 49 2 Cal. App. 4th 402, 440 (1996)) (ordering discovery of Plaintiffs’ medical information as subject to 3 protective order because “California law recognizes a constitutional right to privacy in an individual’s 4 medical history”); Buchanan v. Santos, No. 1:08-CV-01174-AWI, 2011 WL 2112475, at *5 (E.D. Cal. 5 May 26, 2011) (ordering discovery of personnel records as subject to protective order); Sanchez v. Cty. 6 of Sacramento Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. 2:19-CV-01545 MCE AC, 2020 WL 3542328, at *5 (E.D. Cal. 7 June 30, 2020) (ordering discovery of personnel records as subject to protective order). 8 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as 9 defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all 10 copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 11 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 12 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following 13 information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving 14 Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of 15 publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record 16 through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure 17 or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information 18 lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of Protected 19 Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 20 4. DURATION 21 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 22 Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 23 otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and 24 defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion 25 and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time 26 limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 27 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 28 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or 1 Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit 2 any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Soules v. Cadam, Inc.
2 Cal. App. 4th 390 (California Court of Appeal, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Breithaupt v. C&W Facility Services, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breithaupt-v-cw-facility-services-inc-caed-2023.