Breithaupt v. Clarke
This text of 19 S.C.L. 399 (Breithaupt v. Clarke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A compliance with a rule of survey, as much requires the surveyor to attend court, at every Term, (so long as the case stands for trial) in order to re turn his survey on oath, as if under subpoena; and he is as well entitled to be paid for his attendance in the one case as the other. (Nicklin v. Morrow, 1 Con. Rep. Treadway, 474, contra, overruled.)
The surveyor, under a rule of court, is entitled to 10s..for making and certifying, &c. every plat which has been, or is to be the subject of a grant or conveyance. (Sturzenegger v. Marsh, 1 Bailey, 592.)
A surveyor is entitled to 14s. per day, for the time spent in fulfilling appointments to survey, which failed from no fault of his, as well as for each day employed in making the survey. (lb.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 S.C.L. 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breithaupt-v-clarke-scctapp-1833.