Breitbart v. Weill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Breitbart v. Weill

255 A.D. 801

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 21, 1938

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D. 801 (Breitbart v. Weill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Breitbart v. Weill, 255 A.D. 801 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for recovery for professional services rendered by plaintiffs as attorneys for the defendant in claims and actions in respect to disability insurance, the defendant demanded a bill of particulars containing certain items. On motion to vacate or modify the demands the court at Special Term modified and struck out certain demands. Items 6 and 7 should have been allowed. Order modified by allowing and including items 6 and 7 in respect to which plaintiffs are required to furnish particulars, and as so modified the order, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, is affirmed, without costs; the bill of particulars to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for recovery for professional services rendered by plaintiffs as attorneys for the defendant in claims and actions in respect to disability insurance, the defendant demanded a bill of particulars containing certain items. On motion to vacate or modify the demands the court at Special Term modified and struck out certain demands. Items 6 and 7 should have been allowed. Order modified by allowing and including items 6 and 7 in respect to which plaintiffs are required to furnish particulars, and as so modified the order, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, is affirmed, without costs; the bill of particulars to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D. 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breitbart-v-weill-nyappdiv-1938.