Breitbart v. Weill

255 A.D. 801, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5378
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 21, 1938·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action for recovery for professional services rendered by plaintiffs as attorneys for the defendant in claims and actions in respect to disability insurance, the defendant demanded a bill of particulars containing certain items. On motion to vacate or modify the demands the court at Special Term modified and struck out certain demands. Items 6 and 7 should have been allowed. Order modified by allowing and including items 6 and 7 in respect to which plaintiffs are required to furnish particulars, and as so modified the order, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, is affirmed, without costs; the bill of particulars to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Breitbart v. Weill, 255 A.D. 801, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5378 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

255 A.D. 801 (Breitbart v. Weill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sarney v. Olena
278 A.D. 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Ellis v. City of New York
180 Misc. 968 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)