Breier v. Congregation Zemach David of New Square

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Breier v. Congregation Zemach David of New Square

30 A.D.3d 363, 815 N.Y.S.2d 829

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.3d 363 (Breier v. Congregation Zemach David of New Square) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Breier v. Congregation Zemach David of New Square, 30 A.D.3d 363, 815 N.Y.S.2d 829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.), dated September 27, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion, inter alia, to vacate a judgment of the same court entered October 18, 2004, upon its default in appearing or answering, which, after an inquest, was in favor of them and against the defendant in the principal sum of $250,000.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant’s motion, inter alia, to vacate the default judgment (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Seccombe v Serafina Rest. Corp., 2 AD3d 516 [2003]; Perez v Linshar Realty Corp., 259 AD2d 532, 533 [1999]; cf. Labella v Willis Seafood, 296 AD2d 382 [2002]). Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.), dated September 27, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion, inter alia, to vacate a judgment of the same court entered October 18, 2004, upon its default in appearing or answering, which, after an inquest, was in favor of them and against the defendant in the principal sum of $250,000.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant’s motion, inter alia, to vacate the default judgment (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Seccombe v Serafina Rest. Corp., 2 AD3d 516 [2003]; Perez v Linshar Realty Corp., 259 AD2d 532, 533 [1999]; cf. Labella v Willis Seafood, 296 AD2d 382 [2002]). Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.3d 363, 815 N.Y.S.2d 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breier-v-congregation-zemach-david-of-new-square-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack