Breidenbach v. Conrad

690 N.E.2d 549, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1456, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 687
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 25, 1998
Docket97-2609
StatusPublished

This text of 690 N.E.2d 549 (Breidenbach v. Conrad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Breidenbach v. Conrad, 690 N.E.2d 549, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1456, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 687 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

Seneca App. No. 13-97-6. Discretionary appeal allowed on Propositions of Law Nos. I and II; sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 97-517, George v. Ohio Bur. of Workers’ Comp., Montgomery App. No. 16081; briefing schedule stayed.

Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., would allow all propositions of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
690 N.E.2d 549, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1456, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breidenbach-v-conrad-ohio-1998.