Brehm v. Conley

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedFebruary 15, 2011
DocketCivil Action No. 2010-1550
StatusPublished

This text of Brehm v. Conley (Brehm v. Conley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brehm v. Conley, (D.D.C. 2011).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEB 1 5 :'011 Clerk, U S Di t . Courts tor the ~i~~r~c&t oBtanckr,uptcy o umbla ROBERT BREHM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. lO-1550 ) JOYCE K. CONLEY, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Court has allowed the above-captioned action to be provisionally filed. Before the

Court would consider the plaintiff's complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis,

plaintiff was directed to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or

institutional equivalent), including the supporting ledger sheets, for the six-month period

immediately preceding the filing of this complaint, obtained from the appropriate official of each

prison at which plaintiff is or was confined. 28 U.S.c. § 1915. Specifically, plaintiff was

instructed to supplement the statement he already provided to include the months of January

2010 through April 2010. To date, plaintiff has not submitted the required information.

Accordingly, the Court will deny his application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss

the complaint without prejudice.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: ("Ph. / DI ;}..D/I

I 1" i

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brehm v. Conley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brehm-v-conley-dcd-2011.