Brehm v. Conley
This text of Brehm v. Conley (Brehm v. Conley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEB 1 5 :'011 Clerk, U S Di t . Courts tor the ~i~~r~c&t oBtanckr,uptcy o umbla ROBERT BREHM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. lO-1550 ) JOYCE K. CONLEY, ) ) Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The Court has allowed the above-captioned action to be provisionally filed. Before the
Court would consider the plaintiff's complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis,
plaintiff was directed to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or
institutional equivalent), including the supporting ledger sheets, for the six-month period
immediately preceding the filing of this complaint, obtained from the appropriate official of each
prison at which plaintiff is or was confined. 28 U.S.c. § 1915. Specifically, plaintiff was
instructed to supplement the statement he already provided to include the months of January
2010 through April 2010. To date, plaintiff has not submitted the required information.
Accordingly, the Court will deny his application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss
the complaint without prejudice.
An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
DATE: ("Ph. / DI ;}..D/I
I 1" i
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brehm v. Conley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brehm-v-conley-dcd-2011.