Bregman v. Klein

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Bregman v. Klein

178 A. 774, 118 N.J. Eq. 261, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 619

DecidedMay 17, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 178 A. 774 (Bregman v. Klein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bregman v. Klein, 178 A. 774, 118 N.J. Eq. 261, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 619 (N.J. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal is from an interlocutory decree in the court of chancery continuing a restraint order and denying the defendant’s motion to strike the hill of complaint. We are of the opinion that the case was properly held for hearing and that there was no error either in the refusal to strike or in the refusal to dissolve the preliminary restraint.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Donges, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 9.

For reversal — Case, Bodine, Perskie, Wells, JJ. 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appeal is from an interlocutory decree in the court of chancery continuing a restraint order and denying the defendant’s motion to strike the hill of complaint. We are of the opinion that the case was properly held for hearing and that there was no error either in the refusal to strike or in the refusal to dissolve the preliminary restraint.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Donges, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 9.

For reversal — Case, Bodine, Perskie, Wells, JJ. 4.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 A. 774, 118 N.J. Eq. 261, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bregman-v-klein-nj-1935.