Bregman v. Klein

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Bregman v. Klein

178 A. 774, 118 N.J. Eq. 261, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 619

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 17, 1935·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal is from an interlocutory decree in the court of chancery continuing a restraint order and denying the defendant’s motion to strike the hill of complaint. We are of the opinion that the case was properly held for hearing and that there was no error either in the refusal to strike or in the refusal to dissolve the preliminary restraint.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Donges, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 9.

For reversal — Case, Bodine, Perskie, Wells, JJ. 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appeal is from an interlocutory decree in the court of chancery continuing a restraint order and denying the defendant’s motion to strike the hill of complaint. We are of the opinion that the case was properly held for hearing and that there was no error either in the refusal to strike or in the refusal to dissolve the preliminary restraint.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Donges, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 9.

For reversal — Case, Bodine, Perskie, Wells, JJ. 4.

Bregman v. Klein, 178 A. 774, 118 N.J. Eq. 261, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 619 (N.J. 1935).

Pincite

178 A. 774 (Bregman v. Klein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.