Breeze v. Brooks
11 P. 885, 71 Cal. 169, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 550
Opinions
This cause was heard before Department Two of this court, and an opinion rendered January 27, 1886. A hearing by the court in Bank was granted, which has been had. For the reasons given ill the opinion in Department, the judgment and order are reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Breeze v. Brooks, 11 P. 885, 71 Cal. 169, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 550 (Cal. 1886).
11 P. 885 (Breeze v. Brooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lala v. Maiorana
333 P.2d 862 (California Court of Appeal, 1959)
In Re Rogal
112 F. Supp. 712 (S.D. California, 1953)
Miller v. Miller
130 P.2d 438 (California Court of Appeal, 1942)
Penziner v. West American Finance Co.
74 P.2d 252 (California Supreme Court, 1937)
Knudson v. Adams
30 P.2d 608 (California Court of Appeal, 1934)
Zeller v. Knapp
26 P.2d 704 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)
Phelps v. Davies
14 P.2d 922 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)
Bank of Cottonwood v. Henriques
266 P. 836 (California Court of Appeal, 1928)
Murphy v. Clayton
45 P. 267 (California Supreme Court, 1896)
Riley v. Martinelli
21 L.R.A. 33 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
Breeze v. Brooks
22 L.R.A. 257 (California Supreme Court, 1892)