Breese v. United States

108 F. 804, 48 C.C.A. 36, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 3825
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 18, 1901·No. No. 338·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the arguments upon the rehearing of this cause. The opinion of the court is unchanged as to the conclusions reached that there was no error in the court below in overruling the demurrer and in not granting the motion to quash, [805]*805and upon tbe various points decided in the progress of the cause. 3iut, inasmuch as the strong opinion expressed by the judge below in his charge to the jury, in which he used the words “that, in his opinion, it was the duty of the jury to convict the defendant,” was calculated to mislead the jury, who perhaps construed this language as a direction on the part of the court, we think that it would be proper to grant a new trial. For these reasons the case is remanded to the court below, with instructions to grant a new trial.

UBAWLEY, District Judge, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Breese v. United States, 108 F. 804, 48 C.C.A. 36, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 3825 (4th Cir. 1901).

108 F. 804 (Breese v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Arnold George Lauer
287 F.2d 633 (Seventh Circuit, 1961)
Weare v. United States
1 F.2d 617 (Eighth Circuit, 1924)
Dillon v. United States
279 F. 639 (Second Circuit, 1921)
Bank of Jeanerette v. Druilhet
89 So. 674 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1921)
Morse v. United States
255 F. 681 (Fourth Circuit, 1918)
Masters v. United States
42 App. D.C. 350 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1914)
Garst v. United States
180 F. 339 (Fourth Circuit, 1910)
United States v. Breese
172 F. 761 (W.D. North Carolina, 1908)
Breese v. United States
143 F. 250 (Fourth Circuit, 1906)