Breen v. State

156 S.W.3d 438, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 263, 2005 WL 350975
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 15, 2005
DocketNo. ED 84523
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 156 S.W.3d 438 (Breen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Breen v. State, 156 S.W.3d 438, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 263, 2005 WL 350975 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Richard Breen appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.034(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying Mov-ant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-eonviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Jackson
156 S.W.3d 438 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 S.W.3d 438, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 263, 2005 WL 350975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breen-v-state-moctapp-2005.