Breen v. Guttman

Fourth Circuit

Breen v. Guttman

393 F. App'x 124

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 31, 2010·No. No. 09-2340·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John S. Breen and Teresa J. Breen appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Breen v. Guttman, Nos. 1:09-cv-02315-RDB; BK-02-58017-RAG (D. Md. Sept. 21, 2009; filed Nov. 3, 2009, entered Nov. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John S. Breen and Teresa J. Breen appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Breen v. Guttman, Nos. 1:09-cv-02315-RDB; BK-02-58017-RAG (D. Md. Sept. 21, 2009; filed Nov. 3, 2009, entered Nov. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Breen v. Guttman, 393 F. App'x 124 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

393 F. App'x 124 (Breen v. Guttman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.