Breedveld v. A. L. Hartridge Co.
240 A.D. 904
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1933·Published
Opinion
On reargument, judgment as amended nunc pro tunc by order dated August 22, 1932, and order denying motion for a new trial unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Rapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ. [See 239 App. Div. 800; 240 id. 719.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Breedveld v. A. L. Hartridge Co., 240 A.D. 904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
240 A.D. 904 (Breedveld v. A. L. Hartridge Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.