Breeding v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Breeding v. State

157 S.W.2d 1023

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 21, 1942

DocketNo. 22008

StatusPublished

This text of 157 S.W.2d 1023 (Breeding v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Breeding v. State, 157 S.W.2d 1023 (Tex. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Forgery is the offense; the punishment, three years in the state penitentiary.

Appellant has filed his affidavit advising this court that he does not further desire to prosecute his appeal, and prays that the appeal he dismissed.

The appeal is dismissed at the request of appellant

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Forgery is the offense; the punishment, three years in the state penitentiary.

Appellant has filed his affidavit advising this court that he does not further desire to prosecute his appeal, and prays that the appeal he dismissed.

The appeal is dismissed at the request of appellant

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 S.W.2d 1023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breeding-v-state-texcrimapp-1942.