Breeding v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Breeding v. Commonwealth

192 S.E.2d 807, 213 Va. 344, 1972 Va. LEXIS 361

CourtSupreme Court of Virginia

DecidedNovember 27, 1972

DocketRecord 8041

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 192 S.E.2d 807 (Breeding v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Breeding v. Commonwealth, 192 S.E.2d 807, 213 Va. 344, 1972 Va. LEXIS 361 (Va. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant, John Purnell Breeding, was charged in two indictments with exposing his genital parts “with lascivious intent” to two children under the age of fourteen years, in violation of § 18.1-214, Code of 1950, as amended. He was tried by the court without a jury and sentenced to three years in the State Penitentiary on each indictment, with the sentences to run concurrently. We granted writs of error to the judgments.

The evidence shows that on the afternoon of June 24, 1970, two girls, 8 and 10 years old, respectively, were playing on Arbutus Circle in the City of Chesapeake. A car driven by the defendant stopped and he asked them the way to Daniel’s Pharmacy. When the girls approched the car they noticed that defendant’s trousers were unbuckled and unzipped, and they saw what they referred to as his “privacy.” The defendant made no suggestive remarks or gestures *345 and there was no evidence that he was sexually aroused. After obtaining the information sought, defendant went on his way.

The evidence of the Commonwealth is insufficient to prove the lascivious intent required under the statute, and the convictions cannot be upheld. McKeon v. Commonwealth, 211 Va. 24, 26-27, 175 S.E.2d 282, 284 (1970).

The judgments are reversed and set aside and the cases are remanded to the court below for a new trial if the Commonwealth be so advised.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant, John Purnell Breeding, was charged in two indictments with exposing his genital parts “with lascivious intent” to two children under the age of fourteen years, in violation of § 18.1-214, Code of 1950, as amended. He was tried by the court without a jury and sentenced to three years in the State Penitentiary on each indictment, with the sentences to run concurrently. We granted writs of error to the judgments.

The evidence shows that on the afternoon of June 24, 1970, two girls, 8 and 10 years old, respectively, were playing on Arbutus Circle in the City of Chesapeake. A car driven by the defendant stopped and he asked them the way to Daniel’s Pharmacy. When the girls approched the car they noticed that defendant’s trousers were unbuckled and unzipped, and they saw what they referred to as his “privacy.” The defendant made no suggestive remarks or gestures *345 and there was no evidence that he was sexually aroused. After obtaining the information sought, defendant went on his way.

The evidence of the Commonwealth is insufficient to prove the lascivious intent required under the statute, and the convictions cannot be upheld. McKeon v. Commonwealth, 211 Va. 24, 26-27, 175 S.E.2d 282, 284 (1970).

The judgments are reversed and set aside and the cases are remanded to the court below for a new trial if the Commonwealth be so advised.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 S.E.2d 807, 213 Va. 344, 1972 Va. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breeding-v-commonwealth-va-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack