Breed v. Breed
This text of 103 N.W. 271 (Breed v. Breed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbe complaint presents a mere personal promise by a married woman living with her husband to pay for certain family expenses, which in no wise concerned or related to her separate property, however much the parties may have contemplated that the personal liability attempted to be assumed must be satisfied out of such separate estate. Such a contract is not within the power of a married woman and creates no legal liability. Stack v. Padden, 111 Wis. 42, 86 N. W. 568. The court should have granted the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
By the Court. — Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to enter judgment affirming the order of the county court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 N.W. 271, 125 Wis. 100, 1905 Wisc. LEXIS 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breed-v-breed-wis-1905.