Breed v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

166 F. 825, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5322
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
DecidedJanuary 14, 1909
DocketNo. 436
StatusPublished

This text of 166 F. 825 (Breed v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Breed v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 166 F. 825, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5322 (circtdma 1909).

Opinion

BROWN, District Judge.

It is admitted by the plaintiff that the questions arising upon the demurrer are substantially the same as those in the case of Oakes Ames v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company, 166 Fed. 820, in which an opinion has been passed down this day. The defendant’s brief points out that the present case differs from the Ames Case in that Breed was not a shareholder in the Telephone, Telegraph & Cable Company of America, but a shareholder in the Boston & New York Telephone Company, in which the Cable Company owned a majority of the shares.

The reasons given in the opinion in Ames v. this defendant apply with at least equal force to this declaration.

Demurrer sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ames v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
166 F. 820 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 F. 825, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breed-v-american-telephone-telegraph-co-circtdma-1909.