Breed v. Aberdeen Petroleum Corp.

46 A.D.2d 618, 359 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3953
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1974·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 29, 1974, and judgment entered thereon on February 1, 1974, granting summary judgment, modified, on the law, to grant summary judgment for the reasonable value of plaintiff's services and direct an assessment, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Plaintiff established its right to recover for legal fees. Special Term correctly decided that the court had jurisdiction over the defendant (Strasser, Spiegelberg, Fried é Frank v. Schlesinger, 53 Mise 2d 78, affd. 28 A D 2d 828; Elman v. Belson, 32 A D 2d 422). Plaintiff, however, did not establish an account stated. The bills sent by plaintiff were not itemized and their mere retention does not show an accord on the reasonableness of the charges. Concur — Murphy, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.; Nunez, J. P., and Kupferman, J., dissent and vote to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Breed v. Aberdeen Petroleum Corp., 46 A.D.2d 618, 359 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

46 A.D.2d 618 (Breed v. Aberdeen Petroleum Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yannelli, Zevin & Civardi v. Sakol
298 A.D.2d 579 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Goodman v. Lieberman
226 A.D.2d 343 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Ruskin, Moscou, Evans & Faltischek, P. C. v. Beal
212 A.D.2d 687 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Diamond & Golomb v. D'Arc
140 A.D.2d 183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)