Bredford v. Washington
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
BENJAMIN BREDFORD,1 § § No. 277, 2018
Petitioner Below, § Appellant, § §
v. § Court Below—Family Court § of the State of Delaware KAREN and RODNEY WASHINGTON § and HEATHER STONE, § File No. CN17-01266 § Pet. No. 17-25343
Petitioners Below, § Appellees. §
Submitted: September 4, 2018 Decided: September 14, 2018
ORDER
It appears to the Court that, on August 16, 2018, the Senior Court Clerk issued a
notice to the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for his
failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by not paying the Family Court record
preparation fee and transcript costs. The appellant failed to respond to the notice to show
cause within the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to
be unopposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules
3(b) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr. Justice
1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bredford v. Washington (Bredford v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.