Breckwoldt v. Morris
This text of 24 A. 300 (Breckwoldt v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think the learned judge below was right in entering judgment upon the reserved points in favor of the defendants. [297]*297There was nothing upon the record of the justice of the peace to show that the plaintiff was a married woman at the time the judgment against her was rendered. She did not appeal from that judgment, and, after the time limited for an appeal, the plaintiff in that suit issued an execution against the defendant (the plaintiff in this suit), and under it her personal property was levied upon and sold. "Under these circumstances, the judgment of the justice, and the execution issued thereon, was a protection to the constable, and also to the plaintiffs in that suit. There is no analogy between this case and those cited in which the coverture appeared upon the record. The opinion of the learned judge below on the questions reserved is so clear and satisfactory that further comment is unnecessary.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 A. 300, 149 Pa. 291, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breckwoldt-v-morris-pa-1892.