Breckenridge v. Murphy
This text of 15 Ind. 77 (Breckenridge v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Suit upon a transcript of a judgment from Ohio. The judgment was against three, all of whom were non-residents of this State; but Brcelcenridge had property in it, hence this suit; which was commenced by way of attachment. Breelcenridge appeared and answered. No judgment was taken against the other defendants, who had no property in this State, upon a suggestion that they had not been served with process. The objections to the proceedings raise questions of fact, rather than of law.
¥e have carefully looked through the record, and think the judgment should be sustained.
The judgment is affirmed, with 1 per cent, damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 Ind. 77, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breckenridge-v-murphy-ind-1860.