Breckenridge Co. v. Perkins

44 N.Y.S. 1112
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Breckenridge Co. v. Perkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 N.Y.S. 800

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment entered upon the report of the referee in this action finally disposed of all the rights of the parties, and it was clearly a final judgment. Gates v. Canfield, 2 Civ. Proc. R. 254. It is quite true that the judgment, as entered, was defective, in that it did not contain a recital which it should have contained. But this court has held that this judgment should not be set aside for that reason. It is therefore a valid and existing judgment, and the execution issued pursuant to it was properly issued, and should not be set aside. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Breckenridge Co. v. Perkins, 44 N.Y.S. 1112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1897).

44 N.Y.S. 1112 (Breckenridge Co. v. Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.