Breckbill v. Turnpike Company
3 U.S. 496, 1 L. Ed. 694, 3 Dall. 496, 1799 U.S. LEXIS 237
Opinion
on the day fucceeding the argument, delivered an unanimous opinion, that on this fpecial verdiil, the' Plaintiff could not recover, in the prefent form of aition, a-gainft the Defendants, as a corporation: And, therefore, they deemed it unneceffary to decide the other queftions in the' caufe. •
Judgment for the Defendants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Breckbill v. Turnpike Company, 3 U.S. 496, 1 L. Ed. 694, 3 Dall. 496, 1799 U.S. LEXIS 237 (1799).
3 U.S. 496 (Breckbill v. Turnpike Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.
104 A.3d 328 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)
In Re Opening a Private Road for the Benefit of O'Reilly
5 A.3d 246 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)
O'Reilly v. Hickory on the Green Homeowners Ass'n
954 A.2d 57 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)
In Re Opening Private Road Ex Rel. O'Reilly
954 A.2d 57 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)
Smoot v. Mayor of Wetumpka
24 Ala. 112 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1854)