Breckbill v. Turnpike Company

3 U.S. 496, 1 L. Ed. 694, 3 Dall. 496, 1799 U.S. LEXIS 237
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 1, 1799
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 3 U.S. 496 (Breckbill v. Turnpike Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Breckbill v. Turnpike Company, 3 U.S. 496, 1 L. Ed. 694, 3 Dall. 496, 1799 U.S. LEXIS 237 (1799).

Opinion

The Court,

on the day fucceeding the argument, delivered an unanimous opinion, that on this fpecial verdiil, the' Plaintiff could not recover, in the prefent form of aition, a-gainft the Defendants, as a corporation: And, therefore, they deemed it unneceffary to decide the other queftions in the' caufe. •

Judgment for the Defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.
104 A.3d 328 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)
In Re Opening a Private Road for the Benefit of O'Reilly
5 A.3d 246 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)
O'Reilly v. Hickory on the Green Homeowners Ass'n
954 A.2d 57 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)
In Re Opening Private Road Ex Rel. O'Reilly
954 A.2d 57 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)
Smoot v. Mayor of Wetumpka
24 Ala. 112 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1854)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 U.S. 496, 1 L. Ed. 694, 3 Dall. 496, 1799 U.S. LEXIS 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breckbill-v-turnpike-company-scotus-1799.