Breck v. Ringler

56 N.Y. St. Rep. 881
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Breck v. Ringler. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 N.Y.S. 501
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1893·Published

Opinion

Parker, J. —The appellant presents for review a judgment entered on a dismissal of the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case. This determination of the court seems to have been required by the decision of the court of appeals in this action on review of a former judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff. 129 N. Y. 656 ; 42 St. Rep. 356. The plaintiff had produced five additional witnesses on this trial, and proved several facts not in evidence on the former hearing, but the matters now for the first time proven are not of such character as to entitle the plaintiff to go to the jury under the construction which has been given to the contract. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Breck v. Ringler, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 881 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

56 N.Y. St. Rep. 881 (Breck v. Ringler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Breck v. . Ringler
29 N.E. 833 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)