Brechner Bros. Import Corp. v. United States

59 Cust. Ct. 902, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1649
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedNovember 6, 1967
DocketNo. P67/379
StatusPublished

This text of 59 Cust. Ct. 902 (Brechner Bros. Import Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brechner Bros. Import Corp. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 902, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1649 (cusc 1967).

Opinion

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of ladies’ or women’s footwear which on the basis of later received information would have been classified as footwear in chief value of india rubber and not wholly or in chief value of any product of which any synthetic resin or resin-like substance is the chief binding agent, and not wholly or in chief value of any synthetic resin, and on the authority of Adorence Co., Inc. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 369, C.D. 2661), the' claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adorence Co. v. United States
56 Cust. Ct. 369 (U.S. Customs Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 Cust. Ct. 902, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brechner-bros-import-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1967.