Bream v. Spangler
1 Watts & Serg. 378
Opinion
This is a case of clear mistake by the justice as well as the appellant; and the latter ought to have been suffered to perfect his bail on the principle of Means v. Trout, (16 Serg. & Rawle 349). It does not appear that the appellee was too late with his motion to quash, an adjourned court being part of the term; but it is clear that it ought not to have been granted.
Order to quash reversed, and appeal reinstated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bream v. Spangler, 1 Watts & Serg. 378 (Pa. 1841).
1 Watts & Serg. 378 (Bream v. Spangler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Milides v. Vlahakis
79 Pa. D. & C. 86 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1951)
In re Shamokin School District
49 Pa. D. & C. 684 (Northumberland County Court of Common Pleas, 1943)
Wingard v. Bobal
45 Pa. D. & C. 130 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1941)
Gharet v. Johnson
4 Pa. D. & C. 173 (Clinton County Court of Common Pleas, 1923)
State v. Young
56 Me. 219 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1868)
Koenig v. Bauer
57 Pa. 168 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1868)