Breakwell v. State

181 S.W. 727, 78 Tex. Crim. 406, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 5, 1916·No. No. 3873.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

HAKPER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of being a vagrant and his punishment assessed at a fine of $200.

No motion for a new trial accompanies the record. The record contains no bills of exception, nor a statement- of facts. The only notice of appeal contained in the record is recited in the recognizance, the conditions of which are that he shall appear before the court from day to day and from term to term in order to abide the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of the State of Texas in this ease. This recital has been held to be insufficient to confer jurisdiction on this court.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Breakwell v. State, 181 S.W. 727, 78 Tex. Crim. 406, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2 (Tex. 1916).

181 S.W. 727 (Breakwell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barker v. State
412 S.W.2d 652 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)