Breakwell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Breakwell v. State

181 S.W. 727, 78 Tex. Crim. 406, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 5, 1916

DocketNo. 3873.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 181 S.W. 727 (Breakwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Breakwell v. State, 181 S.W. 727, 78 Tex. Crim. 406, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2 (Tex. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

HAKPER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of being a vagrant and his punishment assessed at a fine of $200.

No motion for a new trial accompanies the record. The record contains no bills of exception, nor a statement- of facts. The only notice of appeal contained in the record is recited in the recognizance, the conditions of which are that he shall appear before the court from day to day and from term to term in order to abide the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of the State of Texas in this ease. This recital has been held to be insufficient to confer jurisdiction on this court.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI