Breakstone v. Lodging Technologies, Inc.
608 So. 2d 940, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12451, 1992 WL 353561
Opinion
Relying on Robert B. Ehmann, Inc. v. Bergh, 363 So.2d 613 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), the trial court denied appellants’ motion to implead a third-party defendant in proceedings supplementary. Because Exceletech, Inc. v. Williams, 597 So.2d 275 (Fla.1992), overruled Ehmann, we reverse the trial court’s denial of the motion to implead, and remand for further proceedings not inconsistent with Exceletech.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Breakstone v. Lodging Technologies, Inc., 608 So. 2d 940, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12451, 1992 WL 353561 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
608 So. 2d 940 (Breakstone v. Lodging Technologies, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robert B. Ehmann, Inc. v. Bergh
363 So. 2d 613 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Exceletech, Inc. v. Williams
597 So. 2d 275 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)