Breakstone v. Lodging Technologies, Inc.

608 So. 2d 940, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12451, 1992 WL 353561
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 1, 1992
DocketNo. 92-276
StatusPublished

This text of 608 So. 2d 940 (Breakstone v. Lodging Technologies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Breakstone v. Lodging Technologies, Inc., 608 So. 2d 940, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12451, 1992 WL 353561 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Relying on Robert B. Ehmann, Inc. v. Bergh, 363 So.2d 613 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), the trial court denied appellants’ motion to implead a third-party defendant in proceedings supplementary. Because Exceletech, Inc. v. Williams, 597 So.2d 275 (Fla.1992), overruled Ehmann, we reverse the trial court’s denial of the motion to implead, and remand for further proceedings not inconsistent with Exceletech.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robert B. Ehmann, Inc. v. Bergh
363 So. 2d 613 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Exceletech, Inc. v. Williams
597 So. 2d 275 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
608 So. 2d 940, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12451, 1992 WL 353561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breakstone-v-lodging-technologies-inc-fladistctapp-1992.