Breakstone v. Lodging Technologies, Inc.
This text of 608 So. 2d 940 (Breakstone v. Lodging Technologies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Relying on Robert B. Ehmann, Inc. v. Bergh, 363 So.2d 613 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), the trial court denied appellants’ motion to implead a third-party defendant in proceedings supplementary. Because Exceletech, Inc. v. Williams, 597 So.2d 275 (Fla.1992), overruled Ehmann, we reverse the trial court’s denial of the motion to implead, and remand for further proceedings not inconsistent with Exceletech.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
608 So. 2d 940, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12451, 1992 WL 353561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breakstone-v-lodging-technologies-inc-fladistctapp-1992.