Brazos Valley Urgent Care v. Mary Haislet and James Haislet
This text of Brazos Valley Urgent Care v. Mary Haislet and James Haislet (Brazos Valley Urgent Care v. Mary Haislet and James Haislet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-10-00311-CV
BRAZOS VALLEY URGENT CARE, Appellant v.
MARY HAISLET AND JAMES HAISLET, Appellees
From the 272nd District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 09-002933-CV-272
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Brazos Valley Urgent Care., filed a notice of appeal from an adverse
order issued by the trial court. Now, Brazos Valley has filed a motion to dismiss the
appeal because the parties reached an amicable settlement during mediation and such
settlement has been executed.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a).
TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Reyna, and Justice Davis Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed December 15, 2010 [CV06]
Brazos Valley Urgent Care v. Haislet Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brazos Valley Urgent Care v. Mary Haislet and James Haislet, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brazos-valley-urgent-care-v-mary-haislet-and-james-texapp-2010.