Brazilia, L.L.C. v. Renfrow

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brazilia, L.L.C. v. Renfrow

354 S.W.3d 255, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1655, 2011 WL 6209182

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 13, 2011·No. ED 96146·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Catie Renfrow, appeals from the judgment denying her motion seeking relief from a default judgment entered against her on February 5, 2007, in a rent and possession action. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*256 The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Catie Renfrow, appeals from the judgment denying her motion seeking relief from a default judgment entered against her on February 5, 2007, in a rent and possession action. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*256 The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Brazilia, L.L.C. v. Renfrow, 354 S.W.3d 255, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1655, 2011 WL 6209182 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

354 S.W.3d 255 (Brazilia, L.L.C. v. Renfrow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.