Braziel v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Braziel v. State

1912 OK CR 233, 119 P. 1128, 7 Okla. Crim. 692, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 14

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 5, 1912

DocketNo. A-1090.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 233 (Braziel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Braziel v. State, 1912 OK CR 233, 119 P. 1128, 7 Okla. Crim. 692, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 14 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

BEE CUEIAM.

Bob Braziel, plaintiff in error; was convicted in the eounty court of Carter eounty of a violation of the prohibitory law and was on February 17, 1911, in pursuance to the verdict of the jury, sentenced to serve a term of ninety days in the county jail and pay a fine of one hundred dollars. Prom which judgment an appeal was *693 taken by filing in this court on April 15, 1911, a„petition in error with ease-made. When the ease was called for final submission on the regular assignment of this day, there was a withdrawal by counsel of record of further appearance in the ease. Whereupon the Attorney General moved to affirm for failure to prosecute the appeal. Wherefore, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed for failure to proseeute the appeal. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BEE CUEIAM.

Bob Braziel, plaintiff in error; was convicted in the eounty court of Carter eounty of a violation of the prohibitory law and was on February 17, 1911, in pursuance to the verdict of the jury, sentenced to serve a term of ninety days in the county jail and pay a fine of one hundred dollars. Prom which judgment an appeal was *693 taken by filing in this court on April 15, 1911, a„petition in error with ease-made. When the ease was called for final submission on the regular assignment of this day, there was a withdrawal by counsel of record of further appearance in the ease. Whereupon the Attorney General moved to affirm for failure to prosecute the appeal. Wherefore, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed for failure to proseeute the appeal. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 233, 119 P. 1128, 7 Okla. Crim. 692, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braziel-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.