Braziel v. Charlestown Owners Ass'n

633 F. App'x 187
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 25, 2016
DocketNo. 15-2112
StatusPublished

This text of 633 F. App'x 187 (Braziel v. Charlestown Owners Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Braziel v. Charlestown Owners Ass'n, 633 F. App'x 187 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tishisa Braziel appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action alleging claims under the Fair Housing Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Braziel v. Charlestown Owners Ass’n, No. 1:15-cv-00718-AJT-IDD (E.D.Va. Aug. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
633 F. App'x 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braziel-v-charlestown-owners-assn-ca4-2016.