Brazell v. Irene Independent School Dist.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Brazell v. Irene Independent School Dist.

279 S.W. 871

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 21, 1926

DocketNo. 322.

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 279 S.W. 871 (Brazell v. Irene Independent School Dist.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brazell v. Irene Independent School Dist., 279 S.W. 871 (Tex. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

BARCUS, J.

Howard Mann, one of the defendants in error, has filed his motion in this court asking that this appeal be dismissed because it does not appear that all of the defendants in error have been served with citation.

It appears from the record that the Irene independent school district, a corporation, one of the defendants in error, was only served by citation being served upon J. O. Shafer, its alleged secretary. Shafer has filed his affidavit in this court, which is attached to the mótion of Howard Maun, in which he states under oath that he was not, at the time the original judgment in this cause was rendered, nor when the petition for writ of error was filed in the trial court, nor at the time of the service of the citation on him, nor at this time, a trustee of the Irene independent school district, nor was he the secretary or any officer or agent thereof. Plaintiff in error does not controvert the facts contained in said affidavit. The statute *872 provides that citation on a corporation may ¡ he served on its president, secretary, treasurer, or local agent. Article 2029, Rev. St. 1925. The citation served on Shafer is not legal service on the school district. Camden Fire Ins. Co. v. Hill (Tex. Com. App.) 276 S. W. 887; Queen City Motor Co. v. Texas Auto Supply Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 229 S. W. 591; Latham Co. v. J. M. Radford Gro. Co., 54 Tex. Civ. App. 510, 117 S. W. 909.

Before the appellate court obtains jurisdiction of a cause by writ of error, the transcript must show that all the defendants in error, have been served with citation. Garney v. Menefee, 53 Tex. Civ. App. 490, 118 S. W. 1083; Vineyard v. McCombs, 100 Tex. 318, 99 S. W. 544; Henry v. Boulter, 26 Tex. Civ. App. 387, 63 S. W. 1056.

This appeal will not be dismissed, but, by reason of service not having been had upon all- the defendants in error, this cause is stricken from the docket without prejudice. Plaintiff in error is given permission to withdraw the- transcript and statement of facts which have been filed herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARCUS, J.

Howard Mann, one of the defendants in error, has filed his motion in this court asking that this appeal be dismissed because it does not appear that all of the defendants in error have been served with citation.

It appears from the record that the Irene independent school district, a corporation, one of the defendants in error, was only served by citation being served upon J. O. Shafer, its alleged secretary. Shafer has filed his affidavit in this court, which is attached to the mótion of Howard Maun, in which he states under oath that he was not, at the time the original judgment in this cause was rendered, nor when the petition for writ of error was filed in the trial court, nor at the time of the service of the citation on him, nor at this time, a trustee of the Irene independent school district, nor was he the secretary or any officer or agent thereof. Plaintiff in error does not controvert the facts contained in said affidavit. The statute *872 provides that citation on a corporation may ¡ he served on its president, secretary, treasurer, or local agent. Article 2029, Rev. St. 1925. The citation served on Shafer is not legal service on the school district. Camden Fire Ins. Co. v. Hill (Tex. Com. App.) 276 S. W. 887; Queen City Motor Co. v. Texas Auto Supply Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 229 S. W. 591; Latham Co. v. J. M. Radford Gro. Co., 54 Tex. Civ. App. 510, 117 S. W. 909.

Before the appellate court obtains jurisdiction of a cause by writ of error, the transcript must show that all the defendants in error, have been served with citation. Garney v. Menefee, 53 Tex. Civ. App. 490, 118 S. W. 1083; Vineyard v. McCombs, 100 Tex. 318, 99 S. W. 544; Henry v. Boulter, 26 Tex. Civ. App. 387, 63 S. W. 1056.

This appeal will not be dismissed, but, by reason of service not having been had upon all- the defendants in error, this cause is stricken from the docket without prejudice. Plaintiff in error is given permission to withdraw the- transcript and statement of facts which have been filed herein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 S.W. 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brazell-v-irene-independent-school-dist-texapp-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack